Findings in 1999 (Gray Ranch)
Bareground
- 10 percent more (P = .057) bare ground on prairie dog towns than control area, 55% vs 50%, based on line-transect open spaces between plants (140 meter total transect length on town and same on control area).
- The amount of bare ground represented in small openings tended to be greater off than on dog towns; whereas, the amount of bare ground represented in large openings tended to be greater on than off dog towns.
On or Off town |
Category of bare ground openings, cm |
Relative amount of bare ground as a percentage of all bare ground |
*Statistical probability |
| On | 5 to 10 | 15 | .245 |
| Off | 18 | ||
| On | 11 to 20 | 33 | .132 |
| Off | 37 | ||
| On | 21 to 30 | 18 | .032 |
| Off | 26 | ||
| On | 31 to 40 | 11 | .997 |
| Off | 11 | ||
| On | 41 to 50 | 9.9 | .027 |
| Off | 4.4 | ||
| On | 51 to 60 | 6.2 | .030 |
| Off | 2.3 | ||
| On | 60 to 70 | 4.7 | .018 |
| Off | 0.9 | ||
| On | >70 | 2.6 | .220 |
| Off | 0.6 |
* This is the probability that a difference this big between on vs. off towns could exist by chance alone.
- The percentage of small bare soil openings (0 to 30 cm) were similar on and off dog towns; but, large bare soil openings (>40 cm) tended to be more prevalent on dog towns
On or Off town |
Category of bare ground openings, cm |
Relative number of bare ground as a percentage of all bare ground openings | *Statistical probability |
| On | 5 to 10 | 32 | .134 |
| Off | 37 | ||
| On | 11 to 20 | 39 | .522 |
| Off | 37 | ||
| On | 21 to 30 | 13 | .285 |
| Off | 16 | ||
| On | 31 to 40 | 6.0 | .601 |
| Off | 5.2 | ||
| On | 41 to 50 | 5.2 | .015 |
| Off | 1.5 | ||
| On | 51 to 60 | 2.2 | .018 |
| Off | 0.5 | ||
| On | 60 to 70 | 1.5 | .0237 |
| Off | 0.2 | ||
| On | >70 | 1.6 | .917 |
| Off | 1.8 |
*This is the probability that a difference this big between on vs off towns could exist by chance alone.
- No difference (P = .570) in bare ground on compared to off prairie dog towns, 33 % vs 35 %, based on point-frame measurement (4200 points on town and 4200 points on control area).
Litter and foliar cover:
- No difference in litter (P = .600) or foliar cover (P = .759) on compared to off prairie dog towns, based on point-frame measurement (4200 points on town and 4200 points on control area). Mean litter cover was 32 % and mean foliar cover was 29 %.
Production:
- Total standing crop of dry matter similar (P = .297) on and off prairie dog towns. Average standing crop was 1421 kg/ha ± 145 kg/ha, respectively.
- 47 % more (P = ,005) palatable forage off than on prairie dog towns, that is 1084 kg/ha vs 735 kg/ha, respectively.
- 48 % less blue grama on than off prairie dog towns.
- 251 % more red threeawn on than off prairie dogs towns.
- 240% more galletta grass on than off prairie dog towns.
- 43% less sand dropseed on than off prairie dog towns.
- About 90% of the production off towns is palatable; only 45 % of vegetation on towns is palatable.
Vegetation structure:
- No difference in the frequency distribution of vegetation height classes (0 to 5 cm, 6 to 10 cm, 11 to 20 cm, 21 to 30 cm and >30 cm) on prairie dogs towns compared to off prairie dog towns. Structure was similar on prairie dog towns and control area (P = 0.411, 0.336, 0.858, 0.659 and 0.000, respectively)
- 63% to 66% of vegetation was in the 0 to 5 cm category both on and off prairie dog towns. 81 % to 86 % of vegetation was in the 0 to 10 cm category. 5 cm is about 2 inches; 10 cm is about 4 inches; 30 cm is about 1 foot.
On or Off town |
Height category, cm |
Percentage of vegetation in this height category |
*Statistical probability |
| On | 0 to 5 | 66 | .411 |
| Off | 53 | ||
| On | 6 to 10 | 20 | .336 |
| Off | 28 | ||
| On | 11 to 20 | 12 | .858 |
| Off | 13 | ||
| On | 21 to 30 | 1.18 | .659 |
| Off | 0.91 | ||
| On | >30 | 0 | 0 |
| Off | 0 |
* This is the probability that a difference this big between on vs off towns could exist by chance alone.
Carbon/Nitrogen Ratio:
Percentage carbon in three selected grasses on and off towns was similar. Grasses on town contained 12.5 % more nitrogen than grasses off town. The Carbon to nitrogen ratios were significantly lower on vs off towns. A lower C/N ratio indicates more N turnover. Samples were taken 1st 2 weeks of August.
Grass species |
Percentage Carbon |
Percentage Nitrogen |
Carbon/Nitrogen |
| Red threeawn – on town |
42.33
|
1.00
|
45.5
|
| Red threeawn – off town |
42.36
|
.92
|
50.3
|
| Galletta grass – on town |
41.42
|
1.13
|
37.6
|
| Galletta grass – off town |
41.84
|
1.05
|
43.9
|
| Blue grama – on town |
41.63
|
1.31
|
32.1
|
| Blue grama – off town |
41.86
|
1.08
|
39.4
|