{"id":186,"date":"2017-04-13T00:54:46","date_gmt":"2017-04-13T00:54:46","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/sites.warnercnr.colostate.edu\/larryr\/?page_id=186"},"modified":"2017-04-13T00:55:05","modified_gmt":"2017-04-13T00:55:05","slug":"findings-2001-gray-ranch","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/sites.warnercnr.colostate.edu\/larryr\/findings-2001-gray-ranch\/","title":{"rendered":"Findings in 2001 (Gray Ranch)"},"content":{"rendered":"<table border=\"0\" width=\"90%\" align=\"center\">\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td height=\"53\">\n<div align=\"center\"><span style=\"font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size: large\"><b><span style=\"color: #009900\"><u><span style=\"color: #000000\">Findings in 2001 (Gray Ranch)<\/span><\/u><\/span><\/b><\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td height=\"43\"><b><span style=\"color: #000000;font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size: medium\">Production: [No statistical analysis. Use caution drawing inference]<\/span><\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td height=\"660\">\n<ul>\n<li><span style=\"font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size: medium\"><span style=\"font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size: medium\"><b>Total standing crop of dry matter greater on than off prairie dog towns. Average standing crop in prairie dog and cattle exclosures was 1484 kg\/ha vs 739 kg\/ha, respectively. Yes, more on than off prairie dog towns. <\/b><\/span><\/span>&nbsp;<\/li>\n<li><span style=\"font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size: medium\"><span style=\"font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size: medium\"><b>54 % more palatable grasses off than on prairie dog towns, i.e., 629 kg\/ha vs 335 kg\/ha, respectively.<\/b><\/span><\/span>&nbsp;<\/li>\n<li><span style=\"font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size: medium\"><span style=\"font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size: medium\"><b>Overall the percentage of palatable forage off and on prairie dog towns was very different. 23% of the forage produced on prairie dog towns was palatable, whereas, 85% of the forage produced off prairie dog towns was palatable.<\/b><\/span><\/span>&nbsp;<\/li>\n<li><span style=\"font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size: medium\"><span style=\"font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size: medium\"><b>51 % less blue grama on than off prairie dog towns, i.e., 550 kg\/ha vs 267 kg\/ha, respectively.<\/b><\/span><\/span>&nbsp;<\/li>\n<li><span style=\"font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size: medium\"><span style=\"font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size: medium\"><b>2885 % more red threeawn on than off prairie dog towns, i.e, 577 kg\/ha vs 20 kg\/ha, respectively.<\/b><\/span><\/span>&nbsp;<\/li>\n<li><span style=\"font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size: medium\"><span style=\"font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size: medium\"><b>192 % more galletta grass on than off prairie dog towns, i.e., 225 kg\/ha vs 117 kg\/ha, respectively.<\/b><\/span><\/span>&nbsp;<\/li>\n<li><span style=\"font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size: medium\"><span style=\"font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size: medium\"><b>85 % less sand dropseed on than off prairie dog towns, i.e., 18 kg\/ha vs 123 kg\/ha, respectively.<\/b><\/span><\/span>&nbsp;<\/li>\n<li><span style=\"font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size: medium\"><span style=\"font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size: medium\"><b>On areas of prairie dogs only &#8211; cows excluded &#8211; unpalatable plants composed 91% of all above ground biomass.<\/b><\/span><\/span>&nbsp;<\/li>\n<li><span style=\"font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size: medium\"><span style=\"font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size: medium\"><b>On areas exposed to both prairie dogs and cows, unpalatable plants composed 60 % of all above ground biomass.<\/b><\/span><\/span>&nbsp;<\/li>\n<li><span style=\"font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size: medium\"><b>Palatable grasses were similar on area protected from both prairie dogs and cattle for 2 years (the 1999 exclosures), i.e., 616 kg\/ha vs 629 kg\/ha on and off prairie dogs towns, respectively.<br \/>\n<\/b><\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Findings in 2001 (Gray Ranch) Production: [No statistical analysis. Use caution drawing inference] Total standing crop of dry matter greater on than off prairie dog towns. Average standing crop in prairie dog and cattle exclosures was 1484 kg\/ha vs 739&hellip; <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":117,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-186","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/sites.warnercnr.colostate.edu\/larryr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/186","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/sites.warnercnr.colostate.edu\/larryr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/sites.warnercnr.colostate.edu\/larryr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sites.warnercnr.colostate.edu\/larryr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/117"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sites.warnercnr.colostate.edu\/larryr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=186"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/sites.warnercnr.colostate.edu\/larryr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/186\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":188,"href":"https:\/\/sites.warnercnr.colostate.edu\/larryr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/186\/revisions\/188"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/sites.warnercnr.colostate.edu\/larryr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=186"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}