Peer-reviewed AHPC Study Highlights the Power of Misleading “Ballot Box Biology” Narratives

A new study published in the journal Conservation Science and Practice by researchers at the Animal Human Policy Center and the Center for Human Carnivore Coexistence explored what led voters to reject a 2024 wildlife protection ballot initiative. The study involved conducting intercept interviews with 314 Colorado residents to examine what drove Coloradans to vote against Proposition 127,…

Read More

New Peer-Reviewed Study Finds Widespread Public Support—and Pluralistic Ignorance—Regarding Animal Protection in the United States

A new study published in Human–Animal Interactions and led by researchers from Colorado State University’s Animal-Human Policy Center examines public support for animal protection policies in the United States and reveals a strong pattern of pluralistic ignorance—a systematic tendency for individuals to underestimate how much others support stronger animal welfare protections. The research provides a…

Read More

New Research Shows The Impacts of Messaging on Public Support for Carnivore Protection Ballot Initiatives

At the Animal-Human Policy Center, we set out to test how different messages impact public support for carnivore protection ballot initiatives. Traditional wildlife stakeholders have increasingly used “ballot box biology” arguments—claiming wildlife decisions should be left to state biologists rather than the public. Our prior research suggested that this narrative may have contributed to the…

Read More